On Sunday 18 of August 2013, Margarita Manterola wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c > >> index 4bf0fc0..2ba7f4e 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c > >> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c > >> @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static int set_room(struct tty_struct *tty) > >> > >> * characters will be beeped. > >> */ > >> > >> if (left <= 0) > >> > >> - left = ldata->icanon && !ldata->canon_data; > >> + if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait)) > >> + left = ldata->icanon && !ldata->canon_data; > >> > >> old_left = tty->receive_room; > >> tty->receive_room = left; > > > > Was this applied? You may want to cc rjw... it is a regression, it is > > not pretty, and it is something I blieve I hit but thought it was some > > kind of "X weirdness". > > There were no replies to the previous mail asking for comments, and as > far as I can see this has not been applied. I don't know who rjw is, > could you be a bit more explicit, please?
Hi. Was there some kind of continuation of this thread or the thing died completly? -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / maven.pl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
