On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 04:05:48PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> +static void check_and_drop(void *_data, struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +     struct select_data *data = _data;
> +
> +     /* We're only interested in the root of this subtree */
> +     if (data->start == dentry) {
> +             if (d_mountpoint(dentry))
> +                     data->found = -EBUSY;
> +             if (!data->found)
> +                     __d_drop(dentry);
> +     }
> +}

Wouldn't it be better to do that in caller?  Granted, it's not a hot
path, but... why bother calling it for each dentry in a subtree, only
to return immediately on all calls but the last one?

> +static int __check_submounts_and_drop(struct dentry *parent,
> +                                          struct list_head *dispose)
> +{
> +     struct select_data data = {
> +             .start = parent,
> +             .dispose = dispose,
> +             .found = 0,
> +     };
> +
> +     d_walk(parent, &data, check_and_collect, check_and_drop);
> +
> +     return data.found;
> +}

Incidentally, I would rather expand that in the only caller...

> +/**
> + * check_submounts_and_drop - prune dcache, check for submounts and drop
> + *
> + * All done as a single atomic operation relative to has_unlinked_ancestor().
> + * Returns 0 if successfully unhashed @parent.  If there were submounts then
> + * return -EBUSY.
> + *
> + * @dentry: dentry to prune and drop
> + */
> +int check_submounts_and_drop(struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     /* Negative dentries can be dropped without further checks */
> +     if (!dentry->d_inode) {
> +             d_drop(dentry);
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
> +     spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> +     if (d_unhashed(dentry))
> +             goto out_unlock;
> +     if (list_empty(&dentry->d_subdirs)) {
> +             if (d_mountpoint(dentry)) {
> +                     ret = -EBUSY;
> +                     goto out_unlock;
> +             }
> +             __d_drop(dentry);
> +             goto out_unlock;
> +     }
> +     spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> +
> +     for (;;) {
> +             LIST_HEAD(dispose);
> +             ret = __check_submounts_and_drop(dentry, &dispose);
> +             if (!list_empty(&dispose))
> +                     shrink_dentry_list(&dispose);
> +
> +             if (ret <= 0)
> +                     break;
> +
> +             cond_resched();
> +     }
> +
> +out:
> +     return ret;
> +
> +out_unlock:
> +     spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> +     goto out;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(check_submounts_and_drop);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to