On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that most of the hangup was a lack of agreement on how the API > should work wrt leap seconds.
I don't recall this objection. The interface uses existing clockids, so it probably should keep the existing leap-second behavior of those clockids. > I've always thought that the Right Way to represent a UTC time is > nanoseconds since some epoch, where every potential leap second > counts. Check out the CLOCK_TAI clockid merged in 3.10. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
