On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:04:18AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ncpfs/dir.c b/fs/ncpfs/dir.c
> index 3be0474..1f6419f 100644
> --- a/fs/ncpfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ncpfs/dir.c
> @@ -857,10 +857,11 @@ static struct dentry *ncp_lookup(struct inode *dir, 
> struct dentry *dentry, unsig
>       if (ncp_is_server_root(dir)) {
>               res = ncp_io2vol(server, __name, &len, dentry->d_name.name,
>                                dentry->d_name.len, 1);
> -             if (!res)
> +             if (!res) {
>                       res = ncp_lookup_volume(server, __name, &(finfo.i));
>                       if (!res)
>                               ncp_update_known_namespace(server, 
> finfo.i.volNumber, NULL);
> +             }

That, or shift two lines one indent level out ;-)  I mean,
        if (!foo)
                foo = bar();
        if (!foo)
                baz();
is provably equivalent to
        if (!foo) {
                foo = bar();
                if (!foo)
                        baz();
        }

I agree that the current form shouldn't be left as-is - the kernel isn't
IOCCC and all such.  The only question is which variant would read better...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to