* Alex Thorlton <athorl...@sgi.com> wrote: > > Robin, > > > > I tweaked one of our other tests to behave pretty much exactly as I > > - malloc a large array > > - Spawn a specified number of threads > > - Have each thread touch small, evenly spaced chunks of the array (e.g. > > for 128 threads, the array is divided into 128 chunks, and each thread > > touches 1/128th of each chunk, dividing the array into 16,384 pieces) > > Forgot to mention that the threads don't touch their chunks of memory > concurrently, i.e. thread 2 has to wait for thread 1 to finish first. > This is important to note, since the pages won't all get stuck on the > first node without this behavior.
Could you post the testcase please? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/