On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:32:24PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> > > CC: [email protected] > > CC: [email protected] > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > > index 8d18100..c2cb8a0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > > > > #define ARCH_HAS_DMA_GET_REQUIRED_MASK > > > > +#define DMA_ERROR_CODE (~0) > > I wonder why this isn't more generic. It looks like most (all?) > architectures define it in the same way.
Actually it's defined as 0 on x86 and ia64. All the others define it as ~0. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
