Il 07/09/2013 16:41, Al Viro ha scritto:
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:29:15AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:+static int pram_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflen) +{ + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode; + struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; + u64 block; + char *blockp; + + block = pram_find_data_block(inode, 0); + blockp = pram_get_block(sb, block); + return vfs_readlink(dentry, buffer, buflen, blockp); +}+static void *pram_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) +{ + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode; + struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; + off_t block; + int status; + char *blockp; + + block = pram_find_data_block(inode, 0); + blockp = pram_get_block(sb, block); + status = vfs_follow_link(nd, blockp); + return ERR_PTR(status); +}Just nd_set_link(nd, blockp) instead of that vfs_follow_link() and be done with that; that way you can use generic_readlink() instead of pram_readlink() *and* get lower stack footprint on traversing them.
Yep, you're right (as usual :)) Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
