3.2.51-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@netapp.com>
commit 347e2233b7667e336d9f671f1a52dfa3f0416e2c upstream.
Some architectures, such as ARM-32 do not return the same base address
when you call kmap_atomic() twice on the same page.
This causes problems for the memmove() call in the XDR helper routine
"_shift_data_right_pages()", since it defeats the detection of
overlapping memory ranges, and has been seen to corrupt memory.
The fix is to distinguish between the case where we're doing an
inter-page copy or not. In the former case of we know that the memory
ranges cannot possibly overlap, so we can additionally micro-optimise
by replacing memmove() with memcpy().
Reported-by: Mark Young <myo...@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Matt Craighead <mcraigh...@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bruce Fields <bfie...@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@netapp.com>
Tested-by: Matt Craighead <mcraigh...@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
net/sunrpc/xdr.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
@@ -233,10 +233,13 @@ _shift_data_right_pages(struct page **pa
pgfrom_base -= copy;
vto = kmap_atomic(*pgto);
- vfrom = kmap_atomic(*pgfrom);
- memmove(vto + pgto_base, vfrom + pgfrom_base, copy);
+ if (*pgto != *pgfrom) {
+ vfrom = kmap_atomic(*pgfrom);
+ memcpy(vto + pgto_base, vfrom + pgfrom_base, copy);
+ kunmap_atomic(vfrom);
+ } else
+ memmove(vto + pgto_base, vto + pgfrom_base, copy);
flush_dcache_page(*pgto);
- kunmap_atomic(vfrom);
kunmap_atomic(vto);
} while ((len -= copy) != 0);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
