On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:36:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:23:43AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > And guys, I have to say that the advice on which per-CPU primitive to use
> > varies wildly and randomly. For all I know, each of you individually
> > might well be sticking to the same story, but taken together, your
> > collective advice is strongly resembling white noise.
>
> Its partly because cl and I disagree on things. He doesn't seem to care
> much about validation and believes that people will not make mistakes
> with this stuff.
At some point, my only recourse would be to require an Acked-by from one
of you for any per-CPU changes proposed by the other. I really hope that
it doesn't come to that, but this situation is getting a bit annoying.
> And partly because I didn't get what was going on. While Frederic's
> explanation might be correct it was incomprehensible for me.
And I freely admit that the comments on rcu_is_cpu_idle() are completely
inadequate, and I do apologize for that. Seemed clear at the time.
But then it always does, doesn't it? ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
