On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:36:39PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:56:56 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Although I do like rcu_is_active() better than rcu_read_check(), my
> > concern with rcu_is_active() is that it can easily be mistaken for a
> > global state rather than a per-CPU/thread/task/whatever state.
>
> rcu_is_active_local();
rcu_is_active_here()?
> Although, even though it's cute. I think "rcu_is_watching_you()" has no
> ambiguity.
Like I said, I am tempted...
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
