Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Isn't this why noflushd exists or is this an evil thing that shouldn't
> > ever be used and will eventually eat my disks for breakfast?
>
> It would eat your flash for breakfast. You know, flash memories have
> no spinning parts, so there's nothing to spin down.
Btw Pavel, does noflushd work with 2.4.4? The noflushd version 2.4 I
tried said it couldn't find some kernel process (kflushd? I don't
remember) and that I should use bdflush. The manual says that's
appropriate for older kernels, but not 2.4.4 surely.
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
