On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:22:23 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > might_sleep is moving from linux/kernel.h to linux/sched.h, so any users > > need to include linux/sched.h > > Really? <linux/sched.h> is the worst choice w.r.t. include hell. Yes. Mechanically adding sched.h inclusions into .h files will cause problems. I've had decent success with this sort of thing by adding new, finer-grained headers. Maybe include/linux/might_sleep.h would be a good starting point to fix whatever it was that this fixed. I think I'll make x86-include-linux-schedh-in-asm-uaccessh.patch, tree-sweep-include-linux-schedh-for-might_sleep-users.patch and sched-mark-should_resched-__always_inline.patch go away for now - I need a mergeable tree, fast. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/