Hi Andrew, On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:13:02 -0700 Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:59:34 +0100 Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > > > It's not that bad, actually; I think the variant I've pushed right now > > (vfs.git#for-next, head at f5e1dd34561e0fb06400b378d595198918833021) should > > be doing the right thing. It ought to cover everything in your branch > > in -next from "fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long" on to the > > end of queue. > > That's the correct starting point. The end point should be > "staging/lustre/libcfs: cleanup linux-mem.h".
OK, so I have removed that set of patches from the copy of the -mm tree that is in linux-next today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpw7PTTqM3ro.pgp
Description: PGP signature
