In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wri te: > In practice it's a BS. There is a lot of ways minor modifications of code > could add a preemption point, so if you rely on the lack of such - expect > major PITA. > > Yes, in theory SMP adds some extra fun. Practically, almost every "SMP" > race found so far did not require SMP. Disagree. A significant percentage of the netfilter bugs have been SMP only (the whole thing is non-reentrant on UP). Depends what part of the kernel you play in, Rusty. -- Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Joerg Pommnitz
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Chris Ricker
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Mike Castle
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Mike Porter
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Jes Sorensen
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Alexander Viro
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Rusty Russell
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for thre... Alexander Viro
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for ... Alexander Viro
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting ... Richard Gooch
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Rok Papež
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Rob Landley
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Chester Lott
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Andi Kleen
- Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Jan Hudec