When try to add node to list in __inet_hash_nolisten function, first get the
list and then to lock for using, but in extremeness case, others can del this
node before locking it, then the node should be null.So this patch try to lock
firstly and then get the list for using to avoid this race condition.

Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <jun.d.c...@intel.com>
---
 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index 7bd8983..76e846e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -407,12 +407,15 @@ int __inet_hash_nolisten(struct sock *sk, struct 
inet_timewait_sock *tw)
        WARN_ON(!sk_unhashed(sk));
 
        sk->sk_hash = inet_sk_ehashfn(sk);
-       head = inet_ehash_bucket(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
-       list = &head->chain;
        lock = inet_ehash_lockp(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
 
        spin_lock(lock);
-       __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(sk, list);
+       if (sk_hashed(sk)) {
+               head = inet_ehash_bucket(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
+               list = &head->chain;
+               __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(sk, list);
+       }
+
        if (tw) {
                WARN_ON(sk->sk_hash != tw->tw_hash);
                twrefcnt = inet_twsk_unhash(tw);
-- 
1.7.4.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to