On 12 September 2013 12:46, Srivatsa S. Bhat <[email protected]> wrote: > That sounds good! Even the naming is much better, it conveys the intent > clearly.
Folded below change in my patch (attached):
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index b556d46..23f5845 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ static int
cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
int ret;
/* first sibling now owns the new sysfs dir */
- cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_first(policy->cpus));
+ cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_any_but(policy->cpus, old_cpu));
/* Don't touch sysfs files during light-weight tear-down */
if (frozen)
--
thanks
0001-cpufreq-use-correct-values-of-cpus-in-__cpufreq_remo.patch
Description: Binary data
