On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> But if you still don't like this, let me cook a counter-patch so >> I can realized on my own how terribly wrong I am... > > I'm going to yank all of the clk_register_clkdev() calls out > imminently anyway, so all those these hiding bugs will soon become > apparent in any case. Why don't I place my 'remove ATAGs' patch-set > on top of this one and then finally remove the clk_register_clkdev()s > and watch the carnage ensue? So that creates problem for me as maintainer if I need to pull or revert some of the patches on top of the stack, all of a sudden the file looks horrible. That is why I want every step to be as clean a cut as possible. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
