On 09/12/2013 05:24 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
> Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver to support all Tegra series of SoCs.
> 
> * Make tegra-cpufreq.c a generic Tegra cpufreq driver.
> * Move Tegra20 specific codes into tegra20-cpufreq.c.
> * Bind Tegra cpufreq dirver with a fake device so defer probe would work
>   when we're going to get regulator in the driver to support voltage
>   scaling (DVFS).

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm

> @@ -232,6 +232,12 @@ config ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ
>       bool "TEGRA CPUFreq support"
>       depends on ARCH_TEGRA
>       select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
> +
> +config ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ
> +     bool "NVIDIA TEGRA20"
> +     depends on ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ && ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
>       default y
>       help
> -       This adds the CPUFreq driver support for TEGRA SOCs.
> +       This adds the CPUFreq driver for NVIDIA TEGRA20 SoC.
> +
> +       If in doubt, say N.

This patch removes the following from "config ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ":

        default y
        help
          This adds the CPUFreq driver support for TEGRA SOCs.

I think that option should be left unchanged, such that this patch
*just* adds the new option without changing the existing one. If you do
that, then you can completely drop patch 4/4.

Other than that, this series looks fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to