On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:30:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() > routines > and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be > used > by cpufreq drivers then. > > This patch uses these generic routines for this driver. > > Cc: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 22 +++------------------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Hi Viresh You can add: Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> to [PATCH 069/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines [PATCH 107/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core [PATCH 161/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Convert to light weight ->target_index() routine [PATCH 195/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition() It does however require the patch: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg273378.html but this is not because of this patch series, it was already broken. Thanks Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
