OK, it's fine by me if the "shared" under 2.2.x is not the same, however in that case the field should not appear at all in meminfo, rather than the current zero value, which leads lesser kernel hackers like me up the garden path. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Shared memory quantity not being reflected by /proc/memi... Allan Duncan
- Re: Shared memory quantity not being reflected by /... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Shared memory quantity not being reflected ... Christoph Rohland
- Re: Shared memory quantity not being reflec... Allan Duncan
- Re: Shared memory quantity not being re... Christoph Rohland
- Re: Shared memory quantity not bei... Allan Duncan