On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:10:31AM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote:
>
> On 20010621 Stephen Satchell wrote:
> >
> >By the way, I'm surprised no one has mentioned that a synonym for "thread"
> >is "lightweight process".
> >
>
> In linux. Perhaps this the fault.
> In IRIX, you have sprocs and threads. sprocs have independent pids and you
> can control what you share (mappings, fd table...). Threads group under
> same pid.
I think that's accurate.
> Linux chose the sproc way...
That's not accurate. The Linux way is an infinitely nicer architecture.
For each thing that is shareable you have code like
vm_fork(... flags)
{
if (flags & VM_SHARE) return;
do the work to fork the data structure
}
In other words, it's designed to be shared. The IRIX stuff is disgusting,
you really don't want anything to do with sproc(). It _sounds_ like they
are the same but they aren't - for example, with sproc you get your very
own TLB miss handler. Doesn't that sound special?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
