Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 23 June 2001 22:47, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ummm... GEM was the Geos stuff? (Yeah I remember it, I haven't > > > researched it yet though...) > > > > GEM was a gui from Digital Research I believe. > > Geoworks/Geos was a seperate entity. > > Ah, the DR-DOS answer to dosshell/windows. Cool. (I used Dr. Dos byt never > tried its gui.) Actually I believe GEM predates DR-DOS, and except for being made by the same company I don't think they were ever related. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Rob Landley
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Rob Landley
- [OT] Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Daniel Phillips
- [OT] Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Michal Jaegermann
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Chris Meadors
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix - Now there's ... Rob Landley
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. William T Wilson
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. asmith
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Robert J.Dunlop
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Juan Quintela
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Kai Henningsen
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Rob Landley
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Michael Meissner
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Peter De Schrijver
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Thomas Dodd
- RE: Microsoft and Xenix. Wayne . Brown
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Wayne . Brown
- Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Mike Castle