On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:

> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>
>         struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
>         freqs.old = old freq...
>         freqs.new = new freq...
>
>         cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
>         /* Change rate here */
>
>         cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>
> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>
> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification 
> on
> frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
>
> Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to