On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 12:42 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Mike: no, your patch makes it worse: > - wait-for-zero semops still don't update sem_otime > - sem_otime is initialized to sem_ctime. That's not mentioned in the > sysv standard.
So sem_otime = 0 is a specified semaphore state? I thought the proggy was busted for spinning on a (busted and) irrelevant stamp. Man lernt nie aus. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
