On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:17:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > From: Michael Opdenacker <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> > ---
See comment below. > Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt > index 7703ec7..ad6cba4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are > always welcome! > the corresponding readers must disable preemption, possibly > by calling rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched(). > If the updater uses synchronize_srcu() or call_srcu(), > - the the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and > + the corresponding readers must use srcu_read_lock() and I think this may have actually been a typo for "then", as in "If the updater uses ..., then the corresponding readers must use ...". > srcu_read_unlock(), and with the same srcu_struct. The rules for > the expedited primitives are the same as for their non-expedited > counterparts. Mixing things up will result in confusion and > -- > 1.8.1.5 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
