On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 09:17 +0100, Jingoo Han wrote:
> Use devm_regulator_register() to make cleanup paths simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/vexpress.c |    3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/vexpress.c b/drivers/regulator/vexpress.c
> index 4668c7f..f3ae28a 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/vexpress.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/vexpress.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int vexpress_regulator_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       config.driver_data = reg;
>       config.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>  
> -     reg->regdev = regulator_register(&reg->desc, &config);
> +     reg->regdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, &reg->desc, &config);
>       if (IS_ERR(reg->regdev)) {
>               err = PTR_ERR(reg->regdev);
>               goto error_regulator_register;
> @@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ static int vexpress_regulator_remove(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>       struct vexpress_regulator *reg = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
>       vexpress_config_func_put(reg->func);
> -     regulator_unregister(reg->regdev);
>  
>       return 0;
>  }

I'm assuming it's following a patch adding devm_regulator_register()?

Based on this:

Acked-by: Pawel Moll <[email protected]>

Thanks!

Pawel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to