Mateusz Krawczuk wrote: > > This patch removes old clock management code for S5PC100 and > S5PC110/S5PV210, > since the platform has been already moved to the new clock driver > using Common Clock Framework. > > Signed-off-by: Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawc...@partner.samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com> > --- > This patch series require > S5PC100 and S5PV210 patch series moving to common clock framework. > > arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Kconfig | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile | 1 - > arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 1361 ----------------------------------- > ---- > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 1 - > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 1365 ----------------------------------- > ----- > 6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2730 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > In this case, would be easier to review with using "-D" for format-patch.
And this should be followed by moving common clk series for s5pc100/s5pv210. See s3c64xx common clk patches in v3.13-next/common-clk-s3c64xx branch as a reference. And I have never seen common clk stuff for s5pc100. In addition, I'm not sure we _still_ need to support s5pc100 in mainline. Thanks, - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
