On 09/26/2013 07:06 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 26 September 2013 03:22, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> wrote:
On 09/22/2013 03:21 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
We have a routine for getting value of "off", better call that instead of using
"off" directly.

We are in the fast path, I am not sure invoking a function here is
better than using directly the static variable.

I only did it for consistency as we have this routine specifically for reading
value of "off" and so we better don't use off directly..

Probably we can make it static inline and move it into
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h?

If you move it to cpuidle.h, you will have to move the 'off' variable in the header hence increasing the scope of it.



--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to