John Fremlin wrote: > > A signal number cannot be opened more than once concurrently; > > sigopen() thus provides a way to avoid signal usage clashes > > in large programs. > > Signals are a pretty dopey API anyway - so instead of trying to patch > them up, why not think of something better for AIO? Keep in mind that SIGRTxxx signals are not just used for AIO. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- A signal fairy tale Dan Kegel
- Re: A signal fairy tale Christopher Smith
- Re: A signal fairy tale Balbir Singh
- Re: A signal fairy tale Christopher Smith
- Re: A signal fairy tale Balbir Singh
- Re: A signal fairy tale Jamie Lokier
- Re: A signal fairy tale Christopher Smith
- Re: A signal fairy tale John Fremlin
- Re: A signal fairy tale Jamie Lokier
- Re: A signal fairy tale Christopher Smith
- Re: A signal fairy tale John Fremlin
- Re: A signal fairy tale Daniel R. Kegel
- Re: A signal fairy tale Christopher Smith
- Re: A signal fairy tale Dan Kegel
- Re: A signal fairy tale Daniel R. Kegel
- Re: A signal fairy tale Christopher Smith
- Re: A signal fairy tale Dan Kegel
- Re: A signal fairy tale Dan Kegel
- Re: A signal fairy tale Christopher Smith