On 09/30, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> But at first glance, I think that something like below makes sense
> as 7/6.

Well, _something like_ perhaps,

>       ___wait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition),              \
>                     TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, ret,                       \
>                     spin_unlock_irq(&lock);                           \
> -                   __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret);                  \
> +                   ___wait_schedule_timeout(__ret);                  \

this is obviously wrong ;)

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to