On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:08PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Now we can flush all the TLBs out of the mmu lock without TLB corruption when
> write-proect the sptes, it is because:
> - we have marked large sptes readonly instead of dropping them that means we
>   just change the spte from writable to readonly so that we only need to care
>   the case of changing spte from present to present (changing the spte from
>   present to nonpresent will flush all the TLBs immediately), in other words,
>   the only case we need to care is mmu_spte_update()
> 
> - in mmu_spte_update(), we have checked
>   SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE | PTE_MMU_WRITEABLE instead of PT_WRITABLE_MASK, that
>   means it does not depend on PT_WRITABLE_MASK anymore
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |  9 +++++++--
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 7488229..a983570 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -4320,15 +4320,25 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm 
> *kvm, int slot)
>                       if (*rmapp)
>                               __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, false);
>  
> -                     if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock)) {
> -                             kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> +                     if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))
>                               cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> -                     }
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>       spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * We can flush all the TLBs out of the mmu lock without TLB
> +      * corruption since we just change the spte from writable to
> +      * readonly so that we only need to care the case of changing
> +      * spte from present to present (changing the spte from present
> +      * to nonpresent will flush all the TLBs immediately), in other
> +      * words, the only case we care is mmu_spte_update() where we
> +      * haved checked SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE
> +      * instead of PT_WRITABLE_MASK, that means it does not depend
> +      * on PT_WRITABLE_MASK anymore.
> +      */
> +     kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>  }

What about need_remote_flush? 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to