Is this (printing out versions. etc) really a big deal so we should add stuff like "/proc/xxx", KERN_XXXX to make things more complicated? It sounds to me like to make the kernel "smaller" we'd actually end up with adding more code and complexity to it. And quite frankly, if people don't read MAINTAINERS, they won't read /proc/maintainers either. > >Print all copyright, config, etc. as KERN_DEBUG. > > How about a new level, say "KERN_CONFIG", with a "show-config" > parameter to enable displaying KERN_CONFIG messages? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Paul Mackerras
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Cort Dougan
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Paul Mackerras
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Tommy Reynolds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jeff Garzik
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Dan Podeanu
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Craig Milo Rogers
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Hua Zhong
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Ian Stirling
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Holger Lubitz
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jordan Crouse
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Daniel Phillips
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Chris Boot
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. David Lang
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. szonyi calin
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Rob Landley
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Christoph Zens
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Daniel Stone