This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag
It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com>
---
drivers/net/wan/hostess_sv11.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wan/sealevel.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/hostess_sv11.c b/drivers/net/wan/hostess_sv11.c
index 3d80e42..3d74166 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/hostess_sv11.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/hostess_sv11.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static struct z8530_dev *sv11_init(int iobase, int irq)
/* We want a fast IRQ for this device. Actually we'd like an even faster
IRQ ;) - This is one driver RtLinux is made for */
- if (request_irq(irq, z8530_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ if (request_irq(irq, z8530_interrupt, 0,
"Hostess SV11", sv) < 0) {
pr_warn("IRQ %d already in use\n", irq);
goto err_irq;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/sealevel.c b/drivers/net/wan/sealevel.c
index 4f77484..27860b4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/sealevel.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/sealevel.c
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static __init struct slvl_board *slvl_init(int iobase, int
irq,
/* We want a fast IRQ for this device. Actually we'd like an even faster
IRQ ;) - This is one driver RtLinux is made for */
- if (request_irq(irq, z8530_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ if (request_irq(irq, z8530_interrupt, 0,
"SeaLevel", dev) < 0) {
pr_warn("IRQ %d already in use\n", irq);
goto err_request_irq;
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
