From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
to reject non-__kernel address spaces.  This also rejects __rcu,
which is almost always the right thing to do.  However, the uses in
bond_change_active_slave(), bond_enslave(), and __bond_release_one()
are legitimate: They are assigning a pointer to an element from an
RCU-protected list (or a NULL pointer), and all elements of this list
are already visible to caller.

This commit therefore silences these false positives either by laundering
the pointers using rcu_access_pointer() as suggested by Josh Triplett,
or by using RCU_INIT_POINTER() for NULL pointer assignments.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: bri...@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 72df399c4ab3..2f276b971bc4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ void bond_change_active_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct 
slave *new_active)
                if (new_active)
                        bond_set_slave_active_flags(new_active);
        } else {
-               rcu_assign_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave, new_active);
+               rcu_assign_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave,
+                                  rcu_access_pointer(new_active));
        }
 
        if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
@@ -1601,7 +1602,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct 
net_device *slave_dev)
                 * so we can change it without calling change_active_interface()
                 */
                if (!bond->curr_active_slave && new_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
-                       rcu_assign_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave, new_slave);
+                       rcu_assign_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave,
+                                          rcu_access_pointer(new_slave));
 
                break;
        } /* switch(bond_mode) */
@@ -1801,7 +1803,7 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
        }
 
        if (all) {
-               rcu_assign_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave, NULL);
+               RCU_INIT_POINTER(bond->curr_active_slave, NULL);
        } else if (oldcurrent == slave) {
                /*
                 * Note that we hold RTNL over this sequence, so there
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to