On 09/10/13 18:55, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:00:54PM +0200, Romain Baeriswyl wrote:
>>  static void __i2c_dw_enable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, bool enable)
>> @@ -286,6 +287,7 @@ int i2c_dw_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>>      u32 input_clock_khz;
>>      u32 hcnt, lcnt;
>>      u32 reg;
>> +    u32 sda_falling_time, scl_falling_time;
>>  
>>      input_clock_khz = dev->get_clk_rate_khz(dev);
>>  
>> @@ -307,15 +309,25 @@ int i2c_dw_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>>  
>>      /* set standard and fast speed deviders for high/low periods */
>>  
>> +    if (dev->sda_falling_time)
>> +            sda_falling_time = dev->sda_falling_time;
>> +    else
>> +            sda_falling_time = 300; /* ns */
> 
> I think this looks better:
> 
>       sda_falling_time = dev->sda_falling_time ? dev->sda_falling_time : 300;

You can also use the gcc-ism, which is a bit more concise:

        sda_falling_time = dev->sda_falling_time ?: 300;

~Ryan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to