> >a non modular build but stuffed into their own section so you can pull them > >out with some magic that we'd include in 'REPORTING-BUGS' > > In a /proc file, maybe? A single file ("/proc/authors"? > "/proc/versions"? "/proc/brags"? "/proc/kvell"?) could present the /proc/drivers maybe. It just needs to be a compact summry for debugging - nothing more. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Patrick Dreker
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Greg KH
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. David Woodhouse
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Alan Cox
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Pekka Pietikainen
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Ben Ford
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Alan Cox
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Craig Milo Rogers
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Alan Cox
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Troy Benjegerdes
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jeff Garzik
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Gerhard Mack
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jeff Garzik
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Pavel Machek
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jeff Garzik
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Ian Stirling
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Juan Quintela
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Craig McLean