On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:07:20 +0900 (KST),
>Byeong-ryeol Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>background.c:57: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in \
>>>> this function)
>
>Missing include in fs/jffs2/background.c. spin_unlock_bh() needs the
>definition of do_softirq(). Against 2.4.5-ac21, will fit -ac22 as well.
>
>Index: 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c
>--- 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c Sun, 22 Apr 2001 07:25:55 +1000 kaos
>(linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644)
>+++ 5.52(w)/fs/jffs2/background.c Sat, 30 Jun 2001 14:13:12 +1000 kaos
>(linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644)
>@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #include <linux/jffs2.h>
> #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> #include "nodelist.h"
...
Thank you.
But, it is proved to be that jffs2/background.c includes 'linux/smp_lock.h',
'linux/smp_lock.h' includes 'asm/smplock.h' and 'asm/smplock.h' includes
'linux/interrupt.h'.
Is it correct to put 'linux/interrupt.h' into jffs2/background.c in this
situation?
--
Where there is a will, there is a way. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the future of you and me! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint = 1429 8AAF 8A2C 6043 DA2E BD4C 964C 2698 687D 4B7D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
