On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:46:41AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > + if (gpio_cansleep(gpio)) > > + gpio_set_value_cansleep(gpio, val & (1 << i)); > > + else > > + gpio_set_value(gpio, val & (1 << i)); > > The proper way to do this is just always use the _cansleep() version. > gpio_set_value() only works for chips which do not sleep, > gpio_set_value_cansleep() works for both those who do sleep and those who do > not.
To the gpio-list: Has it been considered to have sth. like gpio_set_value and gpio_set_value_nosleep? I'd think it makes more sense to have the specific function have the specific name. Regards, Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
