On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:19:31PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> Good idea. The patch below works reliably on my sx164.

Reasonable.  Here I've cleaned up time_init a tad as well.


r~



--- arch/alpha/kernel/time.c.orig       Fri Jun 29 11:24:03 2001
+++ arch/alpha/kernel/time.c    Fri Jun 29 11:35:52 2001
@@ -169,6 +169,77 @@ common_init_rtc(void)
        init_rtc_irq();
 }
 
+/*
+ * Calibrate CPU clock using legacy 8254 timer/counter. Stolen from
+ * arch/i386/time.c.
+ */
+
+#define CALIBRATE_LATCH        (52 * LATCH)
+#define CALIBRATE_TIME (52 * 1000020 / HZ)
+
+static unsigned long __init
+calibrate_cc_with_pic(void)
+{
+       int cc;
+       unsigned long count = 0;
+
+       /* Set the Gate high, disable speaker */
+       outb((inb(0x61) & ~0x02) | 0x01, 0x61);
+
+       /*
+        * Now let's take care of CTC channel 2
+        *
+        * Set the Gate high, program CTC channel 2 for mode 0,
+        * (interrupt on terminal count mode), binary count,
+        * load 5 * LATCH count, (LSB and MSB) to begin countdown.
+        */
+       outb(0xb0, 0x43);               /* binary, mode 0, LSB/MSB, Ch 2 */
+       outb(CALIBRATE_LATCH & 0xff, 0x42);     /* LSB of count */
+       outb(CALIBRATE_LATCH >> 8, 0x42);       /* MSB of count */
+
+       cc = rpcc();
+       do {
+               count++;
+       } while ((inb(0x61) & 0x20) == 0);
+       cc = rpcc() - cc;
+
+       /* Error: ECTCNEVERSET */
+       if (count <= 1)
+               goto bad_ctc;
+
+       /* Error: ECPUTOOFAST */
+       if (count >> 32)
+               goto bad_ctc;
+
+       /* Error: ECPUTOOSLOW */
+       if (cc <= CALIBRATE_TIME)
+               goto bad_ctc;
+
+       return ((long)cc * 1000000) / CALIBRATE_TIME;
+
+       /*
+        * The CTC wasn't reliable: we got a hit on the very first read,
+        * or the CPU was so fast/slow that the quotient wouldn't fit in
+        * 32 bits..
+        */
+ bad_ctc:
+       return 0;
+}
+
+/* The Linux interpretation of the CMOS clock register contents:
+   When the Update-In-Progress (UIP) flag goes from 1 to 0, the
+   RTC registers show the second which has precisely just started.
+   Let's hope other operating systems interpret the RTC the same way.  */
+
+static unsigned long __init
+rpcc_after_update_in_progress(void)
+{
+       do { } while (!(CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP));
+       do { } while (CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP);
+
+       return rpcc();
+}
+
 void __init
 time_init(void)
 {
@@ -176,24 +247,15 @@ time_init(void)
        unsigned long cycle_freq, one_percent;
        long diff;
 
-       /*
-        * The Linux interpretation of the CMOS clock register contents:
-        * When the Update-In-Progress (UIP) flag goes from 1 to 0, the
-        * RTC registers show the second which has precisely just started.
-        * Let's hope other operating systems interpret the RTC the same way.
-        */
-       do { } while (!(CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP));
-       do { } while (CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP);
+       /* Calibrate CPU clock -- attempt #1.  */
+       if (!est_cycle_freq)
+               est_cycle_freq = calibrate_cc_with_pic();
 
-       /* Read cycle counter exactly on falling edge of update flag */
-       cc1 = rpcc();
+       cc1 = rpcc_after_update_in_progress();
 
+       /* Calibrate CPU clock -- attempt #2.  */
        if (!est_cycle_freq) {
-               /* Sometimes the hwrpb->cycle_freq value is bogus. 
-                  Go another round to check up on it and see.  */
-               do { } while (!(CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP));
-               do { } while (CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP);
-               cc2 = rpcc();
+               cc2 = rpcc_after_update_in_progress();
                est_cycle_freq = cc2 - cc1;
                cc1 = cc2;
        }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to