3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>

[ Upstream commit 21af8107f27878813d0364733c0b08813c2c192a ]

Meelis Roos reports a crash in esp_free_lun_tag() in the presense
of a disk which has died.

The issue is that when we issue an autosense command, we do so by
hijacking the original command that caused the check-condition.

When we do so we clear out the ent->tag[] array when we issue it via
find_and_prep_issuable_command().  This is so that the autosense
command is forced to be issued non-tagged.

That is problematic, because it is the value of ent->tag[] which
determines whether we issued the original scsi command as tagged
vs. non-tagged (see esp_alloc_lun_tag()).

And that, in turn, is what trips up the sanity checks in
esp_free_lun_tag().  That function needs the original ->tag[] values
in order to free up the tag slot properly.

Fix this by remembering the original command's tag values, and
having esp_alloc_lun_tag() and esp_free_lun_tag() use them.

Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mr...@linux.ee>
Tested-by: Meelis Roos <mr...@linux.ee>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c |   14 ++++++++------
 drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static int esp_need_to_nego_sync(struct
 static int esp_alloc_lun_tag(struct esp_cmd_entry *ent,
                             struct esp_lun_data *lp)
 {
-       if (!ent->tag[0]) {
+       if (!ent->orig_tag[0]) {
                /* Non-tagged, slot already taken?  */
                if (lp->non_tagged_cmd)
                        return -EBUSY;
@@ -564,9 +564,9 @@ static int esp_alloc_lun_tag(struct esp_
                        return -EBUSY;
        }
 
-       BUG_ON(lp->tagged_cmds[ent->tag[1]]);
+       BUG_ON(lp->tagged_cmds[ent->orig_tag[1]]);
 
-       lp->tagged_cmds[ent->tag[1]] = ent;
+       lp->tagged_cmds[ent->orig_tag[1]] = ent;
        lp->num_tagged++;
 
        return 0;
@@ -575,9 +575,9 @@ static int esp_alloc_lun_tag(struct esp_
 static void esp_free_lun_tag(struct esp_cmd_entry *ent,
                             struct esp_lun_data *lp)
 {
-       if (ent->tag[0]) {
-               BUG_ON(lp->tagged_cmds[ent->tag[1]] != ent);
-               lp->tagged_cmds[ent->tag[1]] = NULL;
+       if (ent->orig_tag[0]) {
+               BUG_ON(lp->tagged_cmds[ent->orig_tag[1]] != ent);
+               lp->tagged_cmds[ent->orig_tag[1]] = NULL;
                lp->num_tagged--;
        } else {
                BUG_ON(lp->non_tagged_cmd != ent);
@@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ static struct esp_cmd_entry *find_and_pr
                        ent->tag[0] = 0;
                        ent->tag[1] = 0;
                }
+               ent->orig_tag[0] = ent->tag[0];
+               ent->orig_tag[1] = ent->tag[1];
 
                if (esp_alloc_lun_tag(ent, lp) < 0)
                        continue;
--- a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h
@@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ struct esp_cmd_entry {
 #define ESP_CMD_FLAG_AUTOSENSE 0x04 /* Doing automatic REQUEST_SENSE */
 
        u8                      tag[2];
+       u8                      orig_tag[2];
 
        u8                      status;
        u8                      message;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to