untested, but wasn't this intended instead?
--------------
if (unlikely(x) > 0) doesn't seem to help branch prediction

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kl...@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
index a507907..cf08540 100644
--- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
+++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
@@ -132,14 +132,14 @@ static __always_inline void jump_label_init(void)
 
 static __always_inline bool static_key_false(struct static_key *key)
 {
-       if (unlikely(atomic_read(&key->enabled)) > 0)
+       if (unlikely(atomic_read(&key->enabled) > 0))
                return true;
        return false;
 }
 
 static __always_inline bool static_key_true(struct static_key *key)
 {
-       if (likely(atomic_read(&key->enabled)) > 0)
+       if (likely(atomic_read(&key->enabled) > 0))
                return true;
        return false;
 }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to