On 10/07/13 09:23, Seth Jennings wrote:
> Fix comment typos in swapfile.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> mm/swapfile.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 3963fc2..7968c1b 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ static int unuse_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pmd_t *pmd,
> * some architectures (e.g. x86_32 with PAE) we might catch a glimpse
> * of unmatched parts which look like swp_pte, so unuse_pte must
> * recheck under pte lock. Scanning without pte lock lets it be
> - * preemptible whenever CONFIG_PREEMPT but not CONFIG_HIGHPTE.
> + * preemptable whenever CONFIG_PREEMPT but not CONFIG_HIGHPTE.
Do you have a dictionary source that backs this one up?
The kernel source uses either spelling.
dict.org doesn't find either spelling.
m-w.com doesn't find either spelling.
However, dictionary.com finds preemptible but not preemptable.
> */
> pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
> do {
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
