On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:52:51PM +0800, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> >> @@ -1904,8 +1904,7 @@ int device_rename(struct device *dev, const char 
> >> *new_name)
> >>       if (!dev)
> >>               return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> -     pr_debug("device: '%s': %s: renaming to '%s'\n", dev_name(dev),
> >> -              __func__, new_name);
> >> +     dev_info(dev, "'%s' renaming to '%s'\n", dev_name(dev), new_name);
> >
> > How about:
> >         dev_dbg(dev, "renaming to '%s'\n", new_name);
> 
> If something confusing or wrong, need to take a look.
> For pr_debug(), We have to build and load a debug kernel…
> For dev_dbg(),  We have to rebuild a kernel with CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
> set to 'y', that is default 'n'.

Why would you not enable that option these days?  All distros enable it,
and if you should too :)

> So, do you mean
> 
> dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, dev, "renaming to '%s'\n", new_name);  ?

No, dev_dbg();.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to