This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag

It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/misc/arm-charlcd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/arm-charlcd.c b/drivers/misc/arm-charlcd.c
index 1256a4b..b7ebf80 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/arm-charlcd.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/arm-charlcd.c
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int __init charlcd_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
        lcd->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
        /* If no IRQ is supplied, we'll survive without it */
        if (lcd->irq >= 0) {
-               if (request_irq(lcd->irq, charlcd_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED,
+               if (request_irq(lcd->irq, charlcd_interrupt, 0,
                                DRIVERNAME, lcd)) {
                        ret = -EIO;
                        goto out_no_irq;
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to