On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:43:35PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> +static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
> +{
> + struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
> + struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
> +
> + /*
> + * We keep moving the deadline away until we get some
> + * available runtime for the entity. This ensures correct
> + * handling of situations where the runtime overrun is
> + * arbitrary large.
> + */
> + while (dl_se->runtime <= 0) {
> + dl_se->deadline += dl_se->dl_deadline;
> + dl_se->runtime += dl_se->dl_runtime;
> + }
Are we sure GCC won't be 'smart' and bite us; that is do we need
something like:
asm("" : "+rm" (dl_se->runtime));
in there? See:
0d98bb2656e9 sched: Prevent compiler from optimising the sched_avg_update() loop
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
