Hi Gao-san,

(2013/10/15 15:30), Gao feng wrote:
> Hi Toshiyuki-san,
> On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
>> The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
>> even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it.
>> The situation is a deadlock because only auditd can consume the backlog.
>> If the other process needs to send the backlog, it can be also stopped 
>> by the deadlock.
>>
>> So, audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop.
>>
>> You can see the deadlock with the following reproducer:
>>  # auditctl -a exit,always -S all
>>  # reboot
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okaj...@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com
>> ---
>>  kernel/audit.c |    3 +++
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
>> index 7b0e23a..ce1fb38 100644
>> --- a/kernel/audit.c
>> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
>> @@ -1098,6 +1098,9 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct 
>> audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>>      int reserve;
>>      unsigned long timeout_start = jiffies;
>>  
>> +    if (audit_pid && audit_pid == current->pid)
>> +            gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_WAIT;
>> +
>>      if (audit_initialized != AUDIT_INITIALIZED)
>>              return NULL;
>>  
>>
> 

> Hmm, I see, There may be other code paths that auditd can call 
> audit_log_start except
Yeah. I found it when I reviewed the code paths to audit_log_start after I got 
your comment.

sys_sendto
-> sock_sendmsg
   -> netlink_unicast
      -> audit_receive
         -> audit_receive_skb  
            -> audit_receive_msg
               -> audit_log_config_change
                  -> audit_log_start
               -> audit_log_common_recv_msg     ***
                  -> audit_log_start            ***

> audit_log_config_change. so it's better to handle this problem in 
> audit_log_start.
> 
> but current task is only meaningful when gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT is true.
> so maybe the below patch is what you want.
OK. 

I considered the code size, but I didn't consider the execution speed.
audit_log_start doesn't always need to execute "if (audit_pid && audit_pid == 
current->pid)"! 

I will send your revised patch later.

Thanks,
Toshiyuki Okajima

> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 7b0e23a..10b4545 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -1095,7 +1095,9 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct 
> audit_context
>         struct audit_buffer     *ab     = NULL;
>         struct timespec         t;
>         unsigned int            uninitialized_var(serial);
> -       int reserve;
> +       int reserve = 5; /* Allow atomic callers to go up to five
> +                           entries over the normal backlog limit */
> +
>         unsigned long timeout_start = jiffies;
> 
>         if (audit_initialized != AUDIT_INITIALIZED)
> @@ -1104,11 +1106,12 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct 
> audit_contex
>         if (unlikely(audit_filter_type(type)))
>                 return NULL;
> 
> -       if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT)
> -               reserve = 0;
> -       else
> -               reserve = 5; /* Allow atomic callers to go up to five
> -                               entries over the normal backlog limit */
> +       if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) {
> +               if (audit_pid && audit_pid == current->pid)
> +                       gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_WAIT;
> +               else
> +                       reserve = 0;
> +       }
> 
>         while (audit_backlog_limit
>                && skb_queue_len(&audit_skb_queue) > audit_backlog_limit + 
> reserv
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to