On Mon 23-09-13 13:37:23, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 17-09-13 22:30:31, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Currently each task sends BLK_TN_PROCESS event to the first traced
> > device it interacts with after a new trace is started. When there are
> > several traced devices and the task accesses more devices, this logic
> > can result in BLK_TN_PROCESS being sent several times to some devices
> > while it is never sent to other devices. Thus blkparse doesn't display
> > command name when parsing some blktrace files.
> > 
> > Fix the problem by sending BLK_TN_PROCESS event to all traced devices
> > when a task interacts with any of them.
>   Jens, any opinion about this?
  Jens, ping? I guess this patch fell through cracks...

                                                                Honza
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/blktrace_api.h |  2 ++
> >  kernel/trace/blktrace.c      | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blktrace_api.h b/include/linux/blktrace_api.h
> > index 7c2e030..a12f6ed 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blktrace_api.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blktrace_api.h
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/relay.h>
> >  #include <linux/compat.h>
> >  #include <uapi/linux/blktrace_api.h>
> > +#include <linux/list.h>
> >  
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE)
> >  
> > @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ struct blk_trace {
> >     struct dentry *dir;
> >     struct dentry *dropped_file;
> >     struct dentry *msg_file;
> > +   struct list_head running_list;
> >     atomic_t dropped;
> >  };
> >  
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
> > index b8b8560..7f727b3 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  #include <linux/time.h>
> >  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > +#include <linux/list.h>
> >  
> >  #include <trace/events/block.h>
> >  
> > @@ -38,6 +39,9 @@ static unsigned int blktrace_seq __read_mostly = 1;
> >  static struct trace_array *blk_tr;
> >  static bool blk_tracer_enabled __read_mostly;
> >  
> > +static LIST_HEAD(running_trace_list);
> > +static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(running_trace_lock);
> > +
> >  /* Select an alternative, minimalistic output than the original one */
> >  #define TRACE_BLK_OPT_CLASSIC      0x1
> >  
> > @@ -107,10 +111,18 @@ record_it:
> >   * Send out a notify for this process, if we haven't done so since a trace
> >   * started
> >   */
> > -static void trace_note_tsk(struct blk_trace *bt, struct task_struct *tsk)
> > +static void trace_note_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  {
> > +   unsigned long flags;
> > +   struct blk_trace *bt;
> > +
> >     tsk->btrace_seq = blktrace_seq;
> > -   trace_note(bt, tsk->pid, BLK_TN_PROCESS, tsk->comm, sizeof(tsk->comm));
> > +   spin_lock_irqsave(&running_trace_lock, flags);
> > +   list_for_each_entry(bt, &running_trace_list, running_list) {
> > +           trace_note(bt, tsk->pid, BLK_TN_PROCESS, tsk->comm,
> > +                      sizeof(tsk->comm));
> > +   }
> > +   spin_unlock_irqrestore(&running_trace_lock, flags);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void trace_note_time(struct blk_trace *bt)
> > @@ -229,16 +241,15 @@ static void __blk_add_trace(struct blk_trace *bt, 
> > sector_t sector, int bytes,
> >             goto record_it;
> >     }
> >  
> > +   if (unlikely(tsk->btrace_seq != blktrace_seq))
> > +           trace_note_tsk(tsk);
> > +
> >     /*
> >      * A word about the locking here - we disable interrupts to reserve
> >      * some space in the relay per-cpu buffer, to prevent an irq
> >      * from coming in and stepping on our toes.
> >      */
> >     local_irq_save(flags);
> > -
> > -   if (unlikely(tsk->btrace_seq != blktrace_seq))
> > -           trace_note_tsk(bt, tsk);
> > -
> >     t = relay_reserve(bt->rchan, sizeof(*t) + pdu_len);
> >     if (t) {
> >             sequence = per_cpu_ptr(bt->sequence, cpu);
> > @@ -477,6 +488,7 @@ int do_blk_trace_setup(struct request_queue *q, char 
> > *name, dev_t dev,
> >     bt->dir = dir;
> >     bt->dev = dev;
> >     atomic_set(&bt->dropped, 0);
> > +   INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bt->running_list);
> >  
> >     ret = -EIO;
> >     bt->dropped_file = debugfs_create_file("dropped", 0444, dir, bt,
> > @@ -601,6 +613,9 @@ int blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int 
> > start)
> >                     blktrace_seq++;
> >                     smp_mb();
> >                     bt->trace_state = Blktrace_running;
> > +                   spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
> > +                   list_add(&bt->running_list, &running_trace_list);
> > +                   spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
> >  
> >                     trace_note_time(bt);
> >                     ret = 0;
> > @@ -608,6 +623,9 @@ int blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int 
> > start)
> >     } else {
> >             if (bt->trace_state == Blktrace_running) {
> >                     bt->trace_state = Blktrace_stopped;
> > +                   spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
> > +                   list_del_init(&bt->running_list);
> > +                   spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
> >                     relay_flush(bt->rchan);
> >                     ret = 0;
> >             }
> > @@ -1472,6 +1490,9 @@ static int blk_trace_remove_queue(struct 
> > request_queue *q)
> >     if (atomic_dec_and_test(&blk_probes_ref))
> >             blk_unregister_tracepoints();
> >  
> > +   spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
> > +   list_del(&bt->running_list);
> > +   spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
> >     blk_trace_free(bt);
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 1.8.1.4
> > 
> -- 
> Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> SUSE Labs, CR
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to