On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 05:50:38PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> @@ -930,10 +931,21 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, 
> struct cpuset *trialcs,
>  
>               update_tasks_cpumask(cp, heap);
>  
> +             /*
> +              * If the effective cpumask of any non-empty cpuset is
> +              * changed, we need to rebuild sched domains.
> +              */
> +             if (!cpumask_empty(cp->cpus_allowed) &&
> +                 is_sched_load_balance(cp))
> +                     need_rebuild_sched_domains = true;
> +

Can you please explain *why* this change is being made in the patch
description?  The patch description doesn't give me anything and the
comment explain "what" but not why it's moved from update_cpumask()
into this function with an extra condition.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to