Since the NMI iretq nesting has been fixed, there's no reason that
an NMI handler can not take a page fault for vmalloc'd code. No locks
are taken in that code path, and the software now handles nested NMIs
when the fault re-enables NMIs on iretq.

Not only that, if the vmalloc_fault() WARN_ON_ONCE() is hit, and that
warn on triggers a vmalloc fault for some reason, then we can go into
an infinite loop (the WARN_ON_ONCE() does the WARN() before updating
the variable to make it happen "once").

Reported-by: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 3aaeffc..78926c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -268,8 +268,6 @@ static noinline __kprobes int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long 
address)
        if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END))
                return -1;
 
-       WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
-
        /*
         * Synchronize this task's top level page-table
         * with the 'reference' page table.
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to