Kees Cook wrote: > So I sent this LSM as one I\'d been waiting > for stacking on. Essentially, I\'m breaking the catch-22 by sending > this. I\'d like it to get into the tree so we don\'t have a catch-22 > about stacking any more. :)
I\'m also trying to break the catch-22 by sending KPortReserve. I would send another one which uses only security_file_alloc/free . > The core changes first, and the userspace interface changes next? I welcome that approach, for none of such single function LSM modules depends on userspace interface changes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
